PROSPECTS FOR PERSONALIZATION OF LAW

УДК 340.12 ББК 32.813

  • E. R. Abyzova Moscow Arbitration Court (Moscow, Russia)
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/ralj(2026)1.1
Keywords: personalization of law, legal regulation, algorithmization of law, machine-readable law, software regulations, artificial intelligence, big data, blockchain technology

Abstract

The study of this topic is relevant due to the need for scientific understanding of the theoretical andpractical significance of the future personalization of law, its changes in the context of digital technologieswithin legal science, and the possibilities of its practical application. The purpose of this paper is to establishthe specific features of personalized law, caused by the technologization of social relations, and to determinethe main directions of the development of personalized law in the future. The relationship betweenpersonalization and the algorithmization (mechanization) of law is considered, as well as the use of the latterin the formation of individual legal norms for the purpose of improving the mechanisms of legal regulation.The advantages and possible negative consequences of the personalization of law are analyzed in connection with the risks associated with restrictions in terms of narrowing the possibilities of choice and infringement ofpersonal freedom. Prospects for the personalization of law in the process of implementing individual industrynorms (criminal, civil, contractual, family, and inheritance law) are determined. Attention is drawn to theneed for interdisciplinary cooperation not only between lawyers, but also between programmers, sociologists,economists, and other specialists. The conclusion reached regarding the status of personalized law is that itdoes not replace traditional law, but rather complements it and optimizes its instrument.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Тарасова Е.Н. Личная безопасность граждан и ее конституционные гарантии в современном обществе // Известия Российского государственного педагогического университета им. А.И. Герцена. Серия. Право. 2008. №85. С. 361–364.

2. Хабриева Т.Я. Циклические нормативные массивы в праве // Журнал российского права. 2019. №12. С. 5–18.

3. Хабриева Т.Я., Черногор Н.Н. Будущее права. Наследие академика В.С. Стёпина и юридическая наука. М. : Российская академия наук ; Институт законодательства и сравнительного правоведения при Правительстве Российской Федерации ; ИНФРА-М, 2023. С. 26.

4. Порываева Н.Ф. Алгоритмизация прав : дисс. … канд. юрид. наук., М., 2022. 165 с.

5. Хабриева Т.Я. Идентификация права в современной социальной регуляции // Вопросы философии. 2021. №12. С. 5–17.

6. Понкин И.В., Лаптева А.И. Право и цифра: Машиночитаемое право, цифровые модели-двойники, цифровая формализация и цифровая онтоинженерия в праве : учебник. М. : Буки Веди, 2021. С. 86–88.

7. Липчанская М.А., Привалов С.А. Развитие технологий машиночитаемого права: теоретические проблемы и перспективы // Журнал российского права. 2022. Т. 26. №10. С. 85–96.

8. Горбачёв В.Д. Машиночитаемое право как инструмент цифровой трансформации государственного управления // Экономика. Право. Общество. Т. 9. №3 (з9). 2024. С. 165–183.

9. Шаршун В.А. Машиночитаемое законодательство: понятие, специфика, перспективы развития // Право.by. 2022. №1 (75). С. 91.

10. Янковский Р.М., Вашкевич А.М., Иванов А.Ю., Наумов В.Б., Незнамов А.В., Щёкин Д.М. Машиночитаемое право: правовой вызов современности // Закон. 2021. №10. C. 20–26.

11. Grigoleit Hans C., Bender Philip M. The Law between Generality and Particularity — Potentials and Limits of Personalized Law / Busch Christoph, De Franceschi Alberto, eds., Algorithmic Regulation and Personalized Law. A Hand book. 2021. Pp. 115–136.

12. Дэвис Э. Техногнозис: миф, магия и мистицизм в информационную эпоху. Екатеринбург : Ультра ; Культура, 2008.

13. Зорькин В.Д. Справедливость — императив цивилизации права // Вопросы философии. 2019. №1. С. 6.

14. Цифровое право : учебник / под общ. ред. В.В. Блажеева, М.А. Егоровой. М. : Проспект, 2020. С. 39–40.
№ 1 (2026): Российско-азиатский правовой журнал
Published
2026-02-24
How to Cite
Abyzova E. PROSPECTS FOR PERSONALIZATION OF LAW // Russian-Asian Legal Journal, 2026, № 1. P. 5-12 DOI: 10.14258/ralj(2026)1.1. URL: https://ralj.ru/article/view/%282026%291.1.
Issue
No 1 (2026): Russian-Asian Legal Journal
Section
THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL LEGAL RESEARCH

Copyright (c) 2026 Е. Р. Абызова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).