CONTROL OVER THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF TECHNOLOGIES AS AN ELEMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION OF BELARUS AND RUSSIA

УДК 340.5 ББК 67.082

  • A. A. Bogustov Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno (Grodno, Belarus)
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/ralj(2025)4.18
Keywords: technological sovereignty, intellectual property (IP), secret inventions, comparative legal analysis, patent law, artificial intelligence (AI), harmonisation of legislation

Abstract

The article analyses the role of intellectual property (IP) law in ensuring the technological sovereigntyof Belarus and Russia, defined as national control over critical technologies. It concludes that IP, especiallythrough its function of controlling the development and use of technologies, transforms the concept ofsovereignty into specific legal mechanisms. A comparative legal analysis of the protection of secret inventions,a key tool for controlling the development and use of technologies, is conducted. The similarity of theobjectives of regulating these relations in the laws of Belarus and Russia is revealed, and the existence oftechnical and legal differences in the legislation of these countries is noted. The author draws attention to theneed to develop regulatory approaches to regulating relations concerning the results of artificial intelligenceas a new direction for controlling the development and use of technologies. It is concluded that the prospectsfor the development of Belarusian and Russian legislation lie in harmonising approaches to secret objectsand regulating the results of AI in order to establish control over new technologies, stimulate investment andprevent their uncontrolled appropriation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Демидова С.Е. Факторы обеспечения технологического суверенитета // Вестник экономики, права и социологии. 2024. №2. С. 14–19.

2. Минько Н.С. Вопросы соотношения понятий «информационный суверенитет», «технологический суверенитет», «интеграционный суверенитет» и «консолидированный суверенитет» // Правовое обеспечение технологического суверенитета России и Беларуси. Барнаул : Изд-во Алт. ун-та, 2025. С. 27–33.

3. Гатагонова Р.М. Правовой режим секретных изобретений в Российской Федерации : автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук. Владикавказ, 2012. 22 с.

4. Лосев С.С. Комментарий к новой редакции Положения о секретных изобретениях и полезных моделях. URL: https://etalonline. by/document/?regnum=u01801856&q_id=3270831 (дата обращения: 20.07.2025).

5. Абдуллаев Ю.Г. Технологический суверенитет и технологическое лидерство страны: к вопросу об актуализации понятий // Правовое обеспечение технологического суверенитета России и Беларуси. Барнаул : Изд-во Алт. ун-та, 2025. С. 21–27.

6. Модельный кодекс интеллектуальной собственности для государств — участников СНГ (новая редакция), принят на 57‑м пленарном заседании Межпарламентской Ассамблеи государств — участников СНГ : Постановление от 22.11.2024 №57–20. URL: https://iacis.ru/baza_dokumentov/modelnie_zakonodatelnie_akti_i_rekomendatcii_mpa_sng/modelnie_kodeksi_i_zakoni (дата обращения: 20.07.2025).
№ 4 (2025): Российско-азиатский правовой журнал
Published
2025-12-23
How to Cite
Bogustov A. CONTROL OVER THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF TECHNOLOGIES AS AN ELEMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION OF BELARUS AND RUSSIA // Russian-Asian Legal Journal, 2025, № 4. P. 110-114 DOI: 10.14258/ralj(2025)4.18. URL: https://ralj.ru/article/view/%282025%294.18.
Issue
No 4 (2025): Russian-Asian Legal Journal
Section
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL AND COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDIES

Copyright (c) 2025 А. А. Богустов

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).