THE RIGHT OF COMMON SHARED OWNERSHIP: THE ESSENCE AND PROBLEMS OF PROTECTION
УДК 343.7 ББК 67.408.121+67.404.16
Abstract
The article attempts to rethink the phenomenon of shared ownership, taking into account the conceptof multiple ownership rights to one thing at the same time existing in civil law. The widespread view ofthe right of shared ownership as one right to the same thing belonging to several persons at the same timeis critically evaluated. It is concluded that each co-owner has his own property right, which is limited bythe same rights of other co-owners. The construction of shared ownership is considered in the contextof possession protection proposed in the Concept of the Development of Civil Legislation of the RussianFederation: competition arises between the rights of co-owners, which is won by the possessing co-owner,if, for example, the issue of access to things by other co-owners is resolved. The practical significance of the ideas that common property is a plurality (system) of ownership rights to one thing is shown. In particular, itis proposed to use such a model when resolving conflicts between co-owners when moving into a residentialpremises: the owner who actually uses the residential premises has an advantage over other co-owners andhas the right to prevent other co-owners from moving in until a court decision. The share in the ownershipright is proposed to be considered as a measure of the free exercise by the owner of his rights in the conditionsof multiple ownership rights to one thing.
Downloads
References
Постановление Президиума Высшего Арбитражного Суда РФ от 12.10.2010 №8346/10. URL: http://www.arbitr.ru/bras.net/f.aspx?id_casedoc=1_1_afdc4ae0–910c-43d9–923c-971bf59ce35e (датаобращения: 30.09.2021).
Решение Советского районного суда г. Самара от 18.08.2015 г. №2–3283/2015. URL: https:// sudact.ru/regular/doc/Jcfz4kp00Y5/ (дата обращения: 30.09.2021).
Кодекс Российской Федерации об административных правонарушениях от 30.12.2001 №195 -ФЗ: принят Государственной Думой 20.12.2001 // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2002. №1 (ч. 1). Ст. 1.
Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации от 13.06.1996 №63-ФЗ: принят Государственной Думой 24.05.1996 // Собрание законодательства РФ. 1996. №25. Ст. 2954.
Гражданское право: в 2т. Т. I : учебник / отв. ред. проф. Е.А. Суханов. 2-е изд. М. : БЕК, 1998.
Шершеневич Г.Ф. Учебник русского гражданского права. М. : Спарк, 1995.
Санфилиппо Чезаре. Курс римского частного права : учебник / под общ. ред. Д.В. Дождева. М. : Норма, 2007.
О внесении изменений в часть первую Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации : проект №47538–6/5 федерального закона. URL: http://privlaw.ru/povestka-47/ (дата обращения: 30.09.2021).
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



