“LEGACY OF GENGHIS KHAN” AS AN ASIAN FACTOR IN THE FORMATION OF THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINE OF EURASIANISM

УДК 32:34 ББК 66.1–21

  • E.A. Kulikov Altai State University Email: kulikoveg@yandex.ru
Keywords: Eurasianism, the Asian factor of development, Mongolian statehood, Muscovy, local development, the idea of the ruler

Abstract

The article analyzes the works of representatives of classical Eurasianism. Particular attention is paidto the works of N.S. Trubetskoy, who was one of the first to define the importance of the Asian (Eastern)vector of the development of Russian statehood. The socio-economic and geopolitical substantiation ofthis vector was given by P.N. Savitsky. The manifestations of Asian influence in the idea of monarchy andits implementation in Russia were analyzed by N.N. Alekseev. Finally, G.V. Vernadsky formulated the ideaof a synthesis of Eastern Orthodoxy of Byzantium and the state organization of the Mongol Empire in thefoundation of the Russian state. The Asian factor is formed from the idea-principle, which is the unificationof the inner part of Eurasia, as well as from the mechanism for implementing this idea, based on thesystem of the structure of the great Mongol empire of Genghis Khan. In the political and legal views of the representatives of Eurasianism, this factor can be called the “Legacy of Genghis Khan”. This article is devotedto the influence of this heritage on Russian history, as well as on the formation of the doctrine of Eurasianismand its isolation among other areas of Russian thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Флоровский Г.В. Евразийский соблазн // Мир России — Евразия: Антология / сост.: Л.И. Новикова, И.Н. Сиземская. М. : Высш. шк., 1995. С. 354–385.

2. Бердяев Н.А. Евразийцы. М. : T8RUGRAM, 2018. 112 с.

3. Предчувствия и свершения (предисловие из сборника «Исход к Востоку») // Мир России — Евразия: Антология / сост.: Л.И. Новикова, И.Н. Сиземская. М. : Высш. шк., 1995. С. 23–26.

4. Борщ И.В. Николай Алексеев как философ права : монография. М. : Юрлитинформ, 2015. 168 с.

5. Алексеев Н.Н. Русский народ и государство. М. : Аграф, 2003. 640 с.

6. Трубецкой Н.С. Европа и человечество // Наследие Чингисхана. М. : Эксмо, 2019. С. 89–140.

7. Иванов А.В. Сердце пармы: роман. М. : Изд-во АСТ: Редакция Елены Шубиной, 2015. 507 с.

8. Трубецкой Н.С. Взгляд на русскую историю не с Запада, а с Востока // Наследие Чингисхана. М. : Эксмо, 2019. С. 15–88.

9. Савицкий П.Н. Континент-океан (Россия и мировой рынок) // Исход к Востоку. Философия евразийства / под ред. О.С. Широкова. М. : Добросвет, изд-во «КГУ», 2016. С. 166–193.

10. Алексеев Н.Н. Христианство и идея монархии // Русский народ и государство. М. : Аграф, 2003. С. 48–67.

11. Вернадский Г.В. Начертание русской истории. М. : Алгоритм, 2012. 336 с.

12. Почекаев Р.Ю. Правовая культура Золотой Орды (историко-правовые очерки). М. : Юрлитинформ, 2015. 312 с.
Published
2021-03-29
How to Cite
Kulikov E. “LEGACY OF GENGHIS KHAN” AS AN ASIAN FACTOR IN THE FORMATION OF THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL DOCTRINE OF EURASIANISM // Russian-Asian Law Journal, 2021, № 1. P. 49-54 DOI: 10.14258/ralj(2021)1.10. URL: https://ralj.ru/article/view/%282021%291.10.
Section
LEGAL SYSTEMS OF ASIAN COUNTRIES