AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN: REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND ISSUES (COMPARATIVE ASPECTS)

УДК 34.05 ББК 67.91

  • Y. Stoilov Sofia University “St. KL. Ohridski” Email: ybsvt@abv.bg
Keywords: adoption of the constitution, constitutional amendments, hard and flexible constitutions, conditions and procedures for changing the constitution, Parliament, National Assembly, Great (Grand) National Assembly, President, qualified majority, elections, referendum

Abstract

The article compares conditions and procedures for the adoption of Constitution and amendments to thecurrent constitution between the Republic of Bulgaria and the Republic of Kazakhstan. The criteria used inthe legal theory for the classification of the constitutions according to the way of their change are used. Bothconstitutions refer to the category of the hard. Bulgaria has a solid core of the constitution, which can onlybe changed by a specially elected institution — a Great (Grand) National Assembly. In Kazakhstan there areeven texts that are not subject to change. The experience of several changes to the two basic laws has beenconsidered. Whit them some of the questions have been answered by juridical theory and practice, whileothers remain open. At the end, conclusions are drawn from the parallel between the changes to the bothconstitutions, some of which are of universal significance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Dicey A.V. The Law of the Constitution (1885). Еd. J. W.F. Allison, Oxford, 2013.

2. Ryan M. & St. Foster. Unlocking Constitutional and Administrative Law. 3-d ed. Routledge, 2014.

3. Grimm D. Types of Constitutions // The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law.Ed. by M. Rosenfeld, A. Sajo. Oxford, 2012.

4. Van Alstyne W.W. The Idea of the Constitution as Hard Law // Journal of Legal Education. 1987. Vol. 37.

5. Grimm D.Op. cit

6. Benz A. Balancing Rigidity and Flexibility: Constitutional Dynamics in Federal Systems // West European Politics. 2013. Vol. 36; 2013. Issue, 4. URL: https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.783 346

7. Матаева М. Некоторые особенности процедуры внесения изменений и дополнений в Конституции Казахстана и стран Центральной Азии // Вестник Томского государственого университета. 2003. №292.

8. «Държавен вестник» (ДВ), бр. 85 от 26. 09. 2003 г.; ДВ, бр. 27 от 2006 г.; ДВ, бр. 12 от 02. 2007 г.; ДВ, бр. 100 от 18. 12. 2015 г.

9. ДВ, бр. 18 от 25. 02. 2005 г.

10. Турецки Н.Н. Законодательная ветв власти Казахстана. 2-е изд. Астана, 2015.

11. Неновски Н. Подлежи ли на конституционен съдебен контрол законът за ревизия на Конституцията? // Юридически свят. 2000. №1; Неновски Н. Конституционна ревизия и конституционен контрол // Юридически свят, 2003. №2; Стоилов Я. Държавната власт: правно-политически разграничения и съотношения. С., 2001; Решение на Конституционния съд №3 от 10. 04. 2003 г. по к. д. №22 от 2002 г. (ДВ, бр. 36 от 18. 04. 2003).

12. Регламент Парламента Республики Казахстан. Принят на совместном заседании палат Парламента Республики Казахстан 20 мая 1996 года. URL: http://www.parlam.kz/ru/regulation (дата обращения: 22.01.2019)
Published
2020-07-06
How to Cite
Stoilov Y. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN: REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND ISSUES (COMPARATIVE ASPECTS) // Russian-Asian Law Journal, 2020, № 2. P. 80-88 DOI: 10.14258/ralj(2020)2.11. URL: https://ralj.ru/article/view/2.11.
Section
LEGAL SYSTEMS OF ASIAN COUNTRIES