INDEPENDENT ANTI–CORRUPTION EXPERTISE AS AN INSTITUTION OF PUBLIC CONTROL
УДК 343.353:328.185 ББК 67.401.02
Abstract
The Russian Federation is a democratic State where its multinational people are recognized as thesource of power. Public power by the people is exercised directly and indirectly through public authorities.Civil society institutions are called upon to exercise public control over decisions taken by State and localgovernment bodies. The established legal framework provides for various forms and mechanisms of publiccontrol. Independent anti-corruption expertise is being consolidated as a democratic institution of civilsociety and public control. It is of great importance because it promotes the openness of authorities, actsas a preventive measure against corruption and is a form of public control over the law-making activitiesof bodies and officials. The value of independent anti-corruption expertise is expressed in isolation fromgovernment structures. The scientific article notes the need for the development of this institute and suggestsmeasures to improve it.
Downloads
References
Милованова Л.В. Антикоррупционная экспертиза нормативных правовых актов и их проектов как элемент системы противодействия коррупции // Закон и право. 2024. №3. С. 74–78.
Савицкая О.Г. Конституционно-правовые особенности участия институтов гражданского общества в независимой антикоррупционной экспертизе: основные проблемы и тенденции развития //Russian Journal of Economics and Law. 2023. №17 (1). С. 135–148
Кабанов П.А. Правовое регулирование стимулирования деятельности независимых экспертов, уполномоченных на проведение антикоррупционной экспертизы в Российской Федерации: проблемы и перспективы // Социальная интеграция и развитие этнокультур в евразийском пространстве. 2020. Т. 1. №9. С. 158–164.
Тонков Е.Е., Туранин В.Ю. О необходимости стимулирования независимых антикоррупционных экспертов нормативных правовых актов и их проектов // Конституционализм: симбиоз науки и практики: материалы Международного круглого стола, посвященного памяти и 80-летию со дня рождения заслуженного деятеля науки Российской Федерации, заслуженного юриста России, доктора юридических наук, профессора Н.В. Витрука / отв. ред. М.В. Мархгейм. Краснодар, 2017. С. 56–60.
Казанцева О.Л. Антикоррупционная экспертиза муниципальных нормативных правовых актов: состояние и поиск оптимальных решений // Юрислингвистика. 2018. №9–10 (20–21). С. 5–15.
Copyright (c) 2024 О.Л. Казанцева
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
