BALANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS AND LEGAL CERTAINTY IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
УДК 347.9 ББК 67.410.1
Abstract
The article examines how the principle of legal certainty can serve as a criterion in determiningthe balance and balance of private and public interests in the consideration of cases in court. Russianjurisprudence shows that, at the national level, there is an imbalance in the private and public interest inconsiderations, in which priority is often improperly given to public interest. The principle of legal certaintymay serve as a criterion for finding this balance, taking into account the jurisprudence of the European Courtof Human Rights.
Downloads
References
2. Дербышева Е.А. Принцип правовой определенности как требование определенности нормы права // Юридические исследования. 2017. №2. С. 68–80. DOI: 10.7256/2409–7136.2017.2.21970. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_21970. html (дата обращения 29.10.2019).
3. Ковтун Н. Н., Зорин А.А. Принцип правовой определенности в системе правовых позиций и итоговых вводов Конституционного суда РФ // Вестник Волгоградского гос. ун-та. Серия 5: Юриспруденция. 2015. №3 (28).
4. Морозова Л.А. Правовая определенность как общеправовой универсальный принцип реализации права // Социально-экономические явления и процессы. 2017. Т. 12. №3. С. 250 -255
5. По делу о проверке конституционности положений ч. 1 ст. 16.2 и ч. 2 ст. 27.11 Кодекса Российской Федерации об административных правонарушениях в связи с жалобой общества с ограниченной ответственностью «Авеста» : Постановление Конституционного суда РФ от 26.11.2012 №28-П //Собрание законодательства РФ. 2012. №50 (ч. 6). ст. 7124.
6. Любченко М.Я. Взаимодействие Европейского суда по правам человека и национальных судебных юрисдикций : автореф. дисс. … к. ю. н. М., 2018. 32 с.
7. Определение Судебной коллегии по экономическим спорам Верховного Суда РФ от 20.06.2019 №305-ЭС19–143 по делу № А40–43482/2016 // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
8. Определение Судебной коллегии по экономическим спорам Верховного суда РФ от 22.11.2018 №306-ЭС14–3497 (7,8) по делу № А12–8206/2009 // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
9. Постановление ЕСПЧ от 13.09.2016 по делу «Медведев против РФ» (жалоба №75737/13) // Бюллетень ЕСПЧ. 2017. №4. С. 121–127.
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
