THE POWERS OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE SUPERVISION OF THE BODIES CONDUCTING THE INQUIRY AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION AT THE STAGE OF PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
УДК 343.1 ББК 67.410.20
Abstract
The article discusses the issues of the prosecutor’s implementation of supervisory functions for thebodies of inquiry at the stage of preliminary investigation. The authors conclude that at the stage of thepreliminary investigation the legislator gave the prosecutor a wide range of supervisory powers over theactivities of the bodies of inquiry. However, some of them require adjustments. For example the power of theprosecutor to give consent to the inquirer to initiate a petition before the court for the election cancellation ormodification of a preventive measure or for the production of another procedural action which is allowed onthe basis of a court decision it is advisable to implement not in relation to the inquirer but in relation to thebodies of inquiry. The availability of the prosecutor’s ability to resolve the recusals declared to the inquirerhis recusals as well as to remove the inquirer from further investigation if he violated the requirements ofthe law is superfluous and subject to transfer to the head of the inquiry unit and the head of the inquirybody. The article also concludes that it is necessary to fix a provision in the Criminal Procedure Code of theRussian Federation according to which written instructions of the prosecutor if they had taken place wouldhave been subject to mandatory inclusion in the materials of the criminal case.
Downloads
References
Науменко О.А. Прокурорский надзор как гарантия прав личности при производстве дознания // Общество и право. 2013. №4. С. 192–195.
Тонков Е.Е. Контроль и надзор в российском обществе: приоритеты и перспективы в условиях кризиса // Проблемы правоохранительной деятельности. 2011. №1. С. 86–94.
Гришин Д.А. Правовой статус начальника подразделения дознания // Проблемы управления органами расследования преступлений в связи с изменением уголовно-процессуального законодательства : материалы межвуз. науч.-практ. конф. : в 2 ч. М., 2008. Ч. 1. С. 149–150.
Спирин А.В. О теоретических основах разграничения прокурорского надзора и процессуального (ведомственного) контроля в досудебных стадиях уголовного судопроизводства // Вестник Уральского юридического института МВД России. 2016. №1. С. 54–60.
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
