MAIN DIRECTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN: MAIN PROBLEMS AND WAYS TO IMPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE LEGISLATION

УДК 342.9 ББК 67.401+67.3 (5Узб)

  • J.N. Nematov Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan (Tashkent, Uzbekistan) Email: jura0404uzb@mail.ru
Keywords: administrative law of the Republic of Uzbekistan, administrative proceedings, administrative act, administrative court, judicial control, jurisdiction

Abstract

The article provides a brief scientific analysis of administrative reforms in the Republic of Uzbekistanusing the example of legislation on administrative proceedings. In particular, current problems of determiningthe jurisdiction of cases in administrative proceedings using the example of differentiation from courts incivil cases. Some examples from judicial practice are given. Scientific opinions on solving problems relatedto the determination of administrative jurisdiction are presented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Javier Barnes. Towards a third generation of administrative procedure \\ Susan Rose-Ackerman, Peter L. Lindseth. Comparative administrative law: an introduction. Edward Elgar. 2010. P. 342–343.

Пуделька Й. Право административных процедур и административно-процессуальное право в государствах Центральной Азии — краткий обзор современного состояния // Ежегодник публичного права-2015: Административный процесс. М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2015. С. 63.

Shigeru Kodama. Reform of Administrative Procedure in Uzbekistan and Japanese Legal Assistance // Administrative law reform in Uzbekistan experiences and problems from the legal viewpoint. Collection of seminar papers. Nagoya, 2008. P. 5.

Katsuya Ichihashi. Japanese approach to legal assistance to administrative procedure law in Uzbekistan // Administrative law reform in Uzbekistan experiences and problems from the legal viewpoint.Collection of seminar papers. Nagoya, 2008. P. 35.

Hiroto Tokuda. Cooperation between Japan and Uzbekistan in the sphere of implementation of administrative procedure law // Administrative law reform in Uzbekistan experiences and problems from the legal viewpoint. Collectionofseminarpapers. Nagoya, 2008. P. 47.

Пуделька Й., Деппе Й. Общее административное право в государствах Центральной Азии — краткий обзор современного состояния // Ежегодник публичного права-2014: Административное право: сравнительно-правовые подходы. М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2014. С. 4.

Хамедов И.А., Цай И.М. Институт административных процедур в свете реформирования административно-процессуального права в Узбекистане // Ежегодник публичного права-2014: Административное право: сравнительно-правовые подходы. М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2014. С. 395.

Хван Л.Б. Фиктивный административный акт: перспективы регуляции в странах Центральной Азии // Ежегодник публичного права-2016: Административный акт. М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2015. С. 129–130.

Tom Ginsburg. Written constitutions and the administrative state: on the constitutional character of administrative law. Susan Rose-Ackerman, Peter L. Lindseth. Comparative administrative law: an introduction // Comparative Administrative Law. Susan Rose-Ackerman, Peter L. Lindseth. Edward Elgar. 2010. P. 117.
Published
2023-12-25
How to Cite
Nematov J. MAIN DIRECTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN: MAIN PROBLEMS AND WAYS TO IMPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE LEGISLATION // Russian-Asian Law Journal, 2023, № 4. P. 21-26 DOI: 10.14258/ralj(2023)4.4. URL: http://ralj.ru/article/view/.4.
Section
PUBLIC LAW RESEARCH