THE MAIN PROBLEM OF JURISPRUDENCE IS NOT NIHILISM, BUT FORMALISM

УДК 340.114.5 ББК 67.05

  • V.V. Sorokin Altai State University (Barnaul, Russia)
Keywords: legal formalism, legal nihilism, legality, principles of law, legal culture, legal awareness, legal system

Abstract

In the article, the author gives examples of the dangers of a formal approach when using the institutionof legal responsibility. The author proves that legal formalism in various countries of the world inclinesinvestigators to the probabilistic basis of the accusation. Because legal formalism, from the point of view oflegal values, is meaningless and always fills its void with one thing — political engagement. The doctrine thatrecognizes probable guilt as sufficient for conviction has always served as the basis for political repression inthe history of jurisprudence. That is why legal formalism is not compatible with the regime of legality andrepresents arbitrariness and lawlessness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Витрук Н.В. Общая теория юридической ответственности. М., 2008.

Сорокин В.В. Теория юридической ответственности. М. : Проспект, 2024.

Ларин А.М. Презумпция невиновности. М. : Наука, 1982.

Вопросы защиты по уголовным делам. Л. : ЛГУ, 1967.

Голунский С.А. О вероятности и достоверности в уголовном суде // Проблемы уголовной политики. М., 1937. Кн. IV.

Курылев С.В. О достоверности и вероятности в правосудии // Правоведение. 1968. №7.
Published
2024-06-28
How to Cite
Sorokin V. THE MAIN PROBLEM OF JURISPRUDENCE IS NOT NIHILISM, BUT FORMALISM // Russian-Asian Law Journal, 2024, № 2. P. 9-11 DOI: 10.14258/ralj(2024)2.2. URL: http://ralj.ru/article/view/%282024%292.2.
Section
THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL LEGAL RESEARCH