ABOUT THE QUESTION OF THE ALGORITHM OF ACTION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LAW IN DIFFERENT BRANCHES OF RUSSIAN LAW WHEN REVIEWING CASE
УДК 340.1
Abstract
The article is devoted to the application of the principles of law at the stage of review of the case bythe court of second instance. The principles of law should not be accidentally subjected to special scrutinywhen they are correlated with professionals in the pre-trial stage of the case and at the stage of directjudicial proceedings with properly established public relations by law enforcement professionals. Due to theprinciples of law expressing the needs of the whole society, the evaluation of the actions of the participantsin the legal process becomes more and more objective, justified, and universally recognized.At the same time, one can not but note the fact that even the most seemingly reasonable, includingsupported by the arguments of the principles of law, the verdict of the court, can be critically rethought inthe future. In this regard, we would like to offer some practical recommendations on the use of the principlesof law in the revision of criminal and civil cases in the courts of second instance. In general, the review ofcases in the courts of second instance is an important link in the process of making a balanced and informeddecision of the legal case.
Downloads
References
2. Морозова А.С. Проблемы направления дела на новое рассмотрение в суд первой инстанции
апелляционным судом // Вестник Омского ун-та. Серия : Право. 2013. №4.
3. Иващенко А.П. К вопросу о целесообразности коллегиального рассмотрения дел в арбитражном суде апелляционной инстанции // Вестник Томского гос. ун-та. 2011. №343.
4. Васьковский Е.В. Учебник гражданского процесса. М., 1917.
5. Баранова М.А. Справедливость приговора суда первой инстанции в уголовном процессе России // Вестник Саратовской гос. юр. академии. 2014. №4 (99).
6. Апелляционное постановление № 22–428/2014 от 28 октября 2014 г. по уголовному
делу №22–428/2014 суда Еврейской автономной области. URL: http: // sudact.ru/regular/doc/
CsLhMPPP47JB/?page=2®ular-doc_type=1006®ular-court=®ular-date_from=®ular-case_
doc=®ular-lawchunkinfo=®ular-workflow_stage=®ular-date_to=®ular-area=®ulartxt=принцип+милосердия&_=1520498621415®ular-judge=&snippet_pos=1100#snippet.
6. Цыганенко С.С. Вопросы развития производства в суде второй инстанции // Terra Economicus.
2013. №2.
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
