THE CONSTRUCTION OF “LEGAL CERTAINTY” IN THE CONCEPTUAL-CATEGORICAL APPARATUS OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW OF RUSSIA
УДК 347.91/.95
Abstract
The article explores the place of construction “legal certainty” in the conceptual-categorical apparatusof civil procedure law of Russia. The author analyzes the difficulties of interpretation and application of thecategory of “legal certainty” due to the relative novelty of the use of this concept in terminological circulation,which was put into active terminological circulation in connection with the ratification of the Convention forthe Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the adoption of numerous rulings of theEuropean Court of Rights in relation to Russia person. The author suggests identifying three independentforms of perception and the existence in Russia of new procedural and legal phenomena: 1) a normative(legislative) form; 2) non-normative (judicial) form; 3) doctrinal form. Based on the study of the regulatoryframework, law enforcement practice, the construction of “legal certainty” is assigned to the second group.Since at the moment there is no legislative consolidation, however, its interpretation and interpretation iscontained in judicial practice: court decisions and decisions, as a rule, of the highest judicial instances.
Downloads
References
2. Масаладжиу Р.М. Принцип правовой определенности в науке, практике ЕСПЧ и его влияние
на доступность правосудия на стадии надзорного производства в гражданском и арбитражном процессе // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. 2009. №7.
3. Афанасьев С.Ф. Право на справедливое судебное разбирательство и его реализация в российском гражданском судопроизводств : монография. М., 2009. 296 с.
4. Пальцев Ю.Е. Наличие значительного ущерба как новый критерий приемлемости жалобы
для Европейского суда по правам человека // Юрист. 2011. №4.
5. Соловьева Т.В. Постановления Верховного суда РФ, Конституционного суда РФ и Европейского суда по правам человека в сфере гражданского судопроизводства и порядок их реализации : монография / под ред. О.В. Исаенковой. М., 2011. 337 с.
6. Рехтина И.В. Многоаспектный характер категории «правовая определенность» в постановлениях Конституционного суда Российской Федерации // Российский судья. 2019. №7.
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
