LEGAL CERTAINTY AS AN EVALUATIVE CATEGORY IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

УДК 347.91/.95 ББК 67.410

  • I.V. Rekhtina Altai State University Email: jerdel80@mail.ru
  • M.A . Bolovnev Altai State University Email: slovak92@mail.ru
Keywords: legal certainty, evaluative concepts, European Court of Human Rights, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, civil procedure, law enforcement

Abstract

The article examines the place of the category of “legal certainty” in the system of assessment conceptsused in civil proceedings. Based on an analysis of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rightsand the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the diversity of interpretation and application ofthe category “legal certainty” is revealed. Attention is focused on the multidimensional nature of legalcertainty. This circumstance allows us to conclude that the concept of “legal certainty” is multidimensional,as well as the diversity of aspects and meanings that are invested in this phenomenon. The authorexplores the use and application in evaluating civil cases of appraisal concepts enshrined in regulatoryacts, judicial practice and doctrine. The authors propose their own classification of assessment categories.Three groups of evaluation concepts are distinguished: evaluation categories that have a specificity, ageneral interpretation directly in the norms of the procedural code; evaluation concepts that do not havea normative definition, but which are disclosed and specified in judicial acts; evaluation categories havinga doctrinal interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

I.V. Rekhtina, Altai State University

Кандидат юридических наук, доцент кафедры трудового, экологического права и гражданского процесса Алтайского государственного университета

M.A . Bolovnev, Altai State University

 Старший преподаватель кафедры трудового, экологического права и гражданского процесса Алтайского государственного университета

References

Масаладжиу Р.М. Принцип правовой определенности в науке, практике ЕСПЧ и его влияние на доступность правосудия на стадии надзорного производства в гражданском и арбитражном процессе // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. 2009. №7. С. 22–25.

Осокина Г.Л. Гражданский процесс. Общая часть. 2-е изд., перераб. М., 2008. 752 с.

Иеринг Р. Юридическая техника / сост. А.В. Поляков. М., 2008. 231 с.

Арбитражный процесс : учебник / отв. ред. В.В. Ярков. 6-е изд., перераб. и доп. М., 2014. 848 с.

Абушенко Д.Б. Судебное усмотрение в гражданском и арбитражном процессе. М., 2002. 176 с.

Боннер А.Т. Советский закон и судебное усмотрение // Советское государство и право. 1979.
№6. С. 46–52.

Папкова О.А. Усмотрение суда. М., 2005. 413 с.

Афанасьев С.Ф. Право на справедливое судебное разбирательство и его реализация в российском гражданском судопроизводстве : монография. М., 2009. 296 с.

Пресняков М.В. Правовая определенность и принцип разумной сдержанности законодателя:
проблема формальной и материальной правой определенности // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2014. №4. С. 32.

Рехтина И.В. Многоаспектный характер категории «правовая определенность» в постановлениях Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации // Конституция Российской Федерации: декларации и реальность : материалы Всероссийской научно-практической конференции с международным участием, посвященной 25-летию принятия Конституции РФ / под ред. Е.С. Аничкина. Барнаул,
2018. 209 с.
Russian-Asian Law Journal
Published
2019-09-24
How to Cite
Rekhtina I., . Bolovnev M. LEGAL CERTAINTY AS AN EVALUATIVE CATEGORY IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS // Russian-Asian Law Journal, 2019, № 1. P. 33-38. URL: http://ralj.ru/article/view/6451.
Issue
No 1 (2019): Russian-Asian Law Journal
Section
RUSSIAN LAW: HISTORY AND MODERNITY

Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).