SOME PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW PROVIDING FOR RESPONSIBILITY FOR BRIBERY

УДК 343.3/.7 ББК 67.408.1

  • D.A. Kazantsev Altai State University Email: kazancevbui@mail.ru
Keywords: bribery, qualification of crimes, special knowledge, judicial assessment expertise, judicial merchandising expertise

Abstract

The article is devoted to the use of special knowledge necessary for the correct qualification of crimesrelated to giving and receiving bribes. Thus, a significant amount of facts of bribery is associated with theprovision of property services to a bribe taker or the granting of property rights to him. Problem situationsmay arise when establishing objective signs of corpus delicti provided by Art. 290, 291 and 291.1, 291.2 ofthe Criminal Code in the case of, for example, apartment renovation, construction or transfer, the exclusiveright to the results of intellectual activity and equated to them means of individualization. For this, thesubjects of proof should establish the monetary (value) expression of the rendered services of a propertynature to the bribe taker, as well as the transferred property right. Effective means of resolving these problemsituations are forensic appraisal and merchandising expertise, which belong to the kind of forensic economicexaminations. The use of special knowledge in the framework of forensic examinations will entail a reliabledetermination of qualifying elements of a crime, which will allow to differentiate the committed act eitheras petty bribery, or as receiving (giving) a bribe in significant, large or large amounts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Генпрокуратура рассчитала средний размер взятки в России в 2018 году // РБК [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/18/12/2018/5c18cf2e9a79471a4d084c63 (дата обращения: 20.05.2019).

В Госдуму внесён законопроект, направленный на усиление уголовной ответственности за коррупционные преступления // Президент России [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/ acts/news/51981 (дата обращения: 20.05.2019).

Корнилов Г.А., Лобанов Н.Н. Концепция обоснования оценочной экспертизы как вида судебно-экономической экспертизы // Вестник Российской таможенной академии. №2. М., 2016. С. 84–91.

Сычева Г.И. К вопросу об оценке стоимости объектов интеллектуальной собственности // Вестник Южно-Российского государственного технического университета (Новочеркасского политехнического института). Серия: Социально-экономические науки. №4. Новочеркасск, 2016. С. 18–23.

Пиховкин А.А. Оценка стоимости инвестиционного проекта в системе оценки бизнеса предприятия // Вестник Иркутского государственного технического университета. 2008. №1 (33). С. 159– 163.

Оценка стоимости нематериальных активов. Международное руководство по оценке 4 (МР 4) (пересмотрено в 2010 г.) Совет по международным стандартам оценки // Вопросы оценки. №3. М., 2010. С. 54–67.

Карцев П.В. Рекомендации по подготовке отчетов об оценке недвижимости в рамках спора о величине кадастровой стоимости // Вопросы оценки. №1 (79). М., 2015. С. 56–67.

Тологонова А.М., Рашидбеков Э.Р. Понятие судебно-оценочной экспертизы, ее место при проведении стоимостных исследований в системе судебных экспертиз // Вестник КГУСТА. Бишкек, 2018. №2 (60). С. 193–199.

Сат А.Х. Методологические подходы и методы экспертного исследования объектов судебно товароведческой экспертизы // Новый взгляд: международный научный вестник. Новосибирск, 2016. №15. С. 157–165.
Russian-Asian Law Journal
Published
2019-09-23
How to Cite
Kazantsev D. SOME PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW PROVIDING FOR RESPONSIBILITY FOR BRIBERY // Russian-Asian Law Journal, 2019, № 1. P. 19-23. URL: http://ralj.ru/article/view/6443.
Issue
No 1 (2019): Russian-Asian Law Journal
Section
RUSSIAN LAW: HISTORY AND MODERNITY

Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).