SECRET INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS: RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF LEGAL REGULATION
УДК 347.934 ББК 67.522.1
Abstract
Approaches to legislative regulation in the criminal procedural codes of individual former USSRrepublics of the new institution of covert investigative actions are analyzed. Contradictory assessments ofthe reform of Russian criminal procedure legislation in this context are given, taking into account foreignexperience. There is a tendency to expand the legislative consolidation of the investigator's powers to usesecret methods of obtaining information in the interests of the investigation. The existence of prerequisitesfor more active use by the investigator of secret methods of solving and investigating crimes is substantiated.Their importance in the fulfillment of the investigator's duty prescribed in the Code of Criminal Procedureof the Russian Federation to take measures to identify the person who committed the crime is emphasized.The conclusion is made that there is insufficient scientific support for the introduction of the institution of covert investigative actions in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Current directions ofscientific research in this area, which should be interdisciplinary in nature, are highlighted.
Downloads
References
Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс Республики Казахстан от 04.07.2014 г. №231-V ЗРК URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31575852 (дата обращения: 13.11.2023).
Луговик В.Ф., Баранов А.М. Негласное правоприменение в уголовном преследовании // Научный вестник Омской академии МВД России. 2015. №2. С. 7–11.
Зайцева Е.А. Уголовный процесс России: «Есть у революции начало, нет у революции конца»? // Уголовное судопроизводство. 2018. №1. С. 4–9.
Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации от 18.12.2001 г. №174-ФЗ. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34481/?ysclid=loyfc8cudq299399305 (дата обращения: 13.11.2023).
Деришев Ю.В., Орумбаев Н.Е. Конфиденциальные процессуальные действия в континентальном уголовно-процессуальном законодательстве: поиск компромисса // Юридическая наука и правоприменительная практика. 2015. №2 (32). С. 122–128.
Давыдов С.И. О предпосылках интеграции оперативно-розыскного и уголовно-процессуального законодательства Российской Федерации // Актуальные вопросы законодательного регулирования оперативно-розыскной деятельности : материалы всероссийской научно практической конференции. Омск : Омская юридическая академия. 2012. С. 151–157.
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
