ON THEORETICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE TERMS “TERROR” AND “ERRORISM”
УДК 343.3 ББК 67.408.131.11
Abstract
It should be noted the existing variety of terms used as synonyms for the concept of “terrorism”, forexample, “terror” and “act of terrorism”. The synonymization of these concepts is typical, in particular,for political, sociological, journalistic literature. However, this approach does not correspond to legalmethodology and does not take into account the specific situation in which the specified crime is committed.Therefore, the legal studies on which the dissertation relies in his work usually pose the problem ofdistinguishing between these terms.Difficulties also arise when trying to define the very term “terrorism” at the international or domesticlevels. The author believes that the main factor hindering the search for a unified approach to the definitionof terrorism and its legalization, and as a result, the development of coordinated, united internationalmeasures to combat it, is the extreme politicization of assessments, especially when it comes to state andinterstate terrorism.
Downloads
References
Антонян Ю.М. Терроризм. Криминологическое и уголовно-правовое исследование. М., 1998. С. 11.
Голубев А. Кинжалы, бомбы, револьверы, или Две тысячи лет страха // Гео. 2002. №9. С. 130– 133.
Горбунов К.Г. Терроризм: социально-психологическое исследование. Омск : Изд-во Ом. гос. ун-та, 2010. 384 с.
Дикаев С.У. Террор, терроризм и преступления террористического характера. СПб. : Юрид. центр Пресс, 2006. С. 54.
Мусаелян М.Ф. Историко-правовое развитие уголовного законодательства об ответственности за терроризм в России в XX в. // История государства и права. 2013. №14. С. 39.
Ожегов С.И., Шведова Н.Ю. Толковый словарь русского языка: 80000 слов и фразеологических выражений // Российская академия наук. Институт русского языка им. В.В. Виноградова; 4-е изд., дополненное. М. : ООО «ИТИ Технологии», 2014. 374 с.
Сырых В.М. Логические основания общей теории права. Т. 2. Логика правового исследования. М. : ЗАО Юстицинформ, 2004. С. 39.
Шрагин В.О. Глобальный терроризм США. М., 1991. С. 84.
Gueniffey P. Histoires de la Révolutionet de l'Empire. Paris: Éditions Perrin, 2013. Р. 246–254.
Couvillois F. Saint — Justefasciste? // Le livre noir de la Révolutionfrançaise. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 2012. P. 183–211.
Яцук Н.А. Эпоха террора 1793–1794 годов: обыденность, жестокость или очищение? // Известия РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена. 2015. №175. С. 86–96.
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
