THE INTEGRATION MODEL OF THE RUSSIAN CRIMINAL LAW ON LIABILITY FOR OBSTRUCTION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL AND OTHER LEGITIMATE ACTIVITIES
УДК 346.7 ББК 67.408.122.11
Abstract
Article 169 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is a traditional norm for modern Russianlegislation. It opens Chapter 22 and, based on the content, is designed to ensure the implementation ofthe basic constitutional right — the right to free exercise of economic activity. In this article, the authorexamines this norm in the context of Eurasian integration. Currently, three of the five member countries ofthe Eurasian Economic Union have developed and adopted new Criminal Codes (Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan,Armenia). The Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus, despite the preservation of the basic edition of1999, has undergone serious changes. The criminal laws of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Unioncurrently lack independent norms on criminal liability for obstruction of entrepreneurial or other legitimateeconomic activity. In connection with the designated goal of the Union states — the integration of economiclegislation — there is a need for an inventory of Russian, including criminal legislation in order to form acriminal law based on integration principles (integration model of criminal law). In the study, the authoranalyzes the objective and subjective signs of Article 169 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation,as well as the differentiating signs and sanctions of this norm and comes to the conclusion that it isnecessary to decriminalize the composition as a special case of abuse of official powers with the possibility ofsupplementing Article 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with the corresponding qualifyingfeature.
Downloads
References
Гришаев С.П. Государство как участник гражданско-правовых отношений // СПС «Консультант Плюс».
Даль В.И. Толковый словарь живого великорусского языка : в 4т. URL: https://slovardalja.net/ (дата обращения: 14.08.2023).
Ефремова Т.Ф. Новый словарь русского языка. Толково-словообразовательный. М., 2000. URL: https://lexicography. online/explanatory/efremova/ (дата обращения: 14.08.2023).
Ушаков Д. Н. Толковый словарь. URL: https://ushakovdictionary.ru/ (дата обращения: 14.08.2023).
Ким В.В. Уголовно-правовое обеспечение независимой и безопасной деятельности по отправлению правосудия : автореф. дисс. … канд. юрид. наук. Ставрополь, 2004. С. 11.
Коробейников А.А. Уголовная ответственность за воспрепятствование осуществлению правосудия и производству предварительного расследования : дисс. … канд. юрид. наук. Ставрополь, 2003. С. 81.
Приговор Глазговского районного суда Удмуртской Республики от 20.04.2017 г. по делу №1–77/2017 // ГАС «Правосудие».
Приговор Ленинского районного суда г. Смоленска от 14.04.2021 г. по делу №1–161/2021 // ГАС «Правосудие».
Апелляционное определение Верховного суда Республики Татарстан от 27.03.2018 г. по делу №22–1249/2018 // ГАС «Правосудие».
Гладких В.И. Воспрепятствование законной предпринимательской деятельности: теоретикоприкладной анализ статьи 169 Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации // Научный портал МВД России. 2021. №2. С. 32–39.
Казакова А.А., Кораблева С.Ю. Статья 169 Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации — имитация защиты предпринимательской деятельности // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Право. 2021. №11. С. 919–35.
Постановление Ленинского районного суда г. Чебоксары от 10.01.2018 г.; Приговор Сосногорского городского суда Республики Коми от 12.09.2016 г., дело №1–142/2016; Приговор Автозаводского суда г. Тольятти от 08.09.2016 г. // ГАС «Правосудие».
Приговор Октябрьского районного суда г. Саратова от 06.06.2017 г., дело № 1–51/2017; Приговор Автозаводского районного суда г. Тольятти Самарской области от 29.10.2018 г., дело №№1–350/18 // ГАС «Правосудие».
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).