THE IMPORTANCE OF IDEOLOGICAL DIVERSITY AND POLITICAL PLURALISM FOR THE DOMESTIC STATE: CONSTITUTIONAL–LEGAL AND THEORETICAL–LEGAL ASPECTS
УДК 342.72/.73 ББК: 67.400
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to emphasize the role and significance of the constitutional principle ofideological diversity and political pluralism for maintaining the democratic foundations of the nationalstatehood. The authors show that the existence of this or that ideology is possible only within the frameworkof a constitutionally fixed legal ideology, the essence of which is to maintain a balance of constitutional values, the interests of society, the state and the individual. The paper establishes that the principle of ideologicaldiversity and political pluralism is of particular importance in a democratic constitutional state. Indeed, insuch a state, pluralism, formalized in the form of ideological diversity, is the basis of the constitutional order.Moreover, the priority of human rights as the most important foundation of the rule of law cannot be fullyrealized outside the above-mentioned principles of ideological diversity. The most complete realization ofthese rights and obligations is possible precisely in conditions of ideological diversity.
Downloads
References
2. Юсубов Э.С. К вопросу о конституционной идеологии Российской Федерации // Представительная власть в Российской Федерации: история, теория, практика : материалы Международной научно-практической конференции / под ред. И.И. Лора, Л.В. Тена. Барнаул, 2013. С. 81–84.
3. Авакьян С.А. Конституция России: природа, эволюция, современность. М., 2000. 456 c.
4. Шувалов И.И. Проблема эффективности правотворчества в свете современной политико правовой теории управления обществом // Журнал российского права. 2010. №4. С. 86–88.
5. Цалиев А. М, Цгоев Т.В. О конституционных основах государственно-правовой идеологии в Российской Федерации // Ленинградский юридический журнал. 2013. №1. С. 137.
6. Дугин А.Г. Обществоведение для граждан Новой России. М., 2007. 344 c.
7. Исаева К. М. К вопросу о содержании конституционного принципа идеологического многообразия // Юридический вестник Дагестанского государственного университета. 2012. №4. С. 56–59.
Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).