CONFLICT RULES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN RUSSIA AND BULGARIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

УДК 341.9.019 ББК 67.93

  • E. S. Anichkin Altai State University Email: rrd231@rambler.ru
  • Yanaki Stoilov Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria Email: ybsvt@abv.bg
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/ralj(2022)1.8
Keywords: source of law, international private law, conflict rules, comparative legal analysis

Abstract

The main differences in the internal conflict rules of private international law in Russia and Bulgaria areidentified and considered. According to the authors, legal diversity lies in the sources of conflict regulation,the mutually exclusive content of individual conflict rules of the two countries, the level of completenessand quality of conflict regulation, as well as the conflict of qualifications of some legal concepts. Eachmanifestation of diversity is illustrated by references to the relevant conflict rules.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Кодекс международного частного права Болгарии от 17.05.2005. URL: https://pravo.hse.ru/intprilaw/doc/041701 (дата обращения 08.02.2022)

Гражданский кодекс РФ (часть 3) от 26.11.2001 №146-ФЗ // Собрание законодательства РФ.2001. №49. Ст. 4552.

Семейный кодекс РФ от 29.12.1995 №223-ФЗ // Собрание законодательства РФ. 1996. №1.Ст. 16.

Трудовой кодекс РФ от 30.12.2001 №197-ФЗ // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2002. №1 (ч. 1). Ст. 3.

Кодекс торгового мореплавания РФ от 30.04.1999 №81-ФЗ // Собрание законодательства РФ. 1999. №18. Ст. 2207.

Гражданский процессуальный кодекс РФ от 14.11.2002 №138-ФЗ // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2002. №46. Ст. 4532.

Арбитражный процессуальный кодекс РФ от 24.07.2002 №95-ФЗ // Собрание законодательства РФ. 2002. №30. Ст. 3012.

Постановление Пленума Верховного Суда РФ от 9 июля 2019 г. №24 «О применении норм международного частного права судами Российской Федерации» // Российская газета. 2019. 17 июля.
Published
2022-02-25
How to Cite
Anichkin E. S., Stoilov Y. CONFLICT RULES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN RUSSIA AND BULGARIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS // Russian-Asian Law Journal, 2022, № 1. P. 51-55 DOI: 10.14258/ralj(2022)1.8. URL: http://ralj.ru/article/view/%282022%291.8.
Issue
No 1 (2022): Russian-Asian Law Journal
Section
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND COMPARATIVE JURISPRUDENCE

Russian-Asian Law Journal is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Russian-Asian Law Journal allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).